Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Control | scipios | 8-1 | None |
| Jeskai Control | soulstrong | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
| Goblins | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Red Deck Wins | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Boros Equipments | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Unknown Archetype | kanister | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Control | kinghairy | 6-2 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | gerardo94 | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Legends , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Convoke , Boros Equipments , Boros Forge , Boros Mice , Boros Monument , Boros Recommission
Meta Performance Analysis
Sunbillow Verge ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 63.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Sunbillow Verge is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 39.71 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Sunbillow Verge has a win rate of 76.6%, making it 3.0% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crumb and Get It | Instant | 11 | 88.1% | 8 |
| Flashfreeze | Instant | 14 | 81.2% | 6 |
| Chandra, Hope's Beacon | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 20 | 80.0% | 7 |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 44 | 78.8% | 21 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 47 | 77.7% | 21 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 52 | 76.6% | 22 |
| Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 47 | 75.5% | 19 |
| Demonic Ruckus | Enchantment — Aura | 10 | 74.0% | 5 |
| High Noon | Enchantment | 7 | 73.5% | 2 |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 59 | 73.3% | 23 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Sunbillow Verge than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline Rush | Instant | 2 | 5 | 100.0% | 83.1% | +16.9% |
| Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 3 | 5 | 85.7% | 72.9% | +12.8% |
| Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 88.2% | 75.7% | +12.6% |
| High Noon | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 85.2% | 73.8% | +11.3% |
| Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 5 | 6 | 80.8% | 73.3% | +7.5% |
| Screaming Nemesis | Creature — Spirit | 3 | 6 | 80.8% | 74.3% | +6.5% |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 9 | 81.8% | 76.3% | +5.5% |
| Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 4 | 43 | 78.8% | 75.0% | +3.8% |
| Split Up | Sorcery | 3 | 22 | 80.0% | 76.5% | +3.5% |
| Kutzil's Flanker | Creature — Cat Warrior | 3 | 39 | 80.5% | 77.1% | +3.4% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boros Burn | 75 | 19.1% | 42.0% |
| Red Deck Wins | 51 | 3.7% | 58.7% |
| Boros Convoke | 46 | 80.7% | 44.2% |
| Jeskai Control | 41 | 85.4% | 74.5% |
| Unknown Archetype | 37 | 10.2% | 49.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.